Why InfiPlex › The Cost of One Connection
InfiPlex + The Platform You Already Run

The Cost of One Connection

You don't have to leave your current platform to stop paying its growth pricing. Keep it running exactly as it is. Add the next connection through InfiPlex instead, published pricing from $49.99/month, and let the two run side by side, or have InfiPlex connect to your existing platform so nothing changes in your flow. Grow faster and easier. The numbers on this page cover thirteen platforms and come from SEC filings, vendors' own pricing pages and app listings, and what sellers describe paying; the calculator runs on yours.

Your numbers, not ours

Run your own quote

At your current provider, we estimate you are paying about $4,000 a month, and a new connection at a quote-only platform averages around $1,500 a month more. Where a vendor publishes a per-connection or per-channel price, picking that platform below fills it in. Swap in the renewal quote sitting in your inbox. Everything computes on this page; nothing is sent anywhere.

 

Our mid-market estimate; replace it with your real bill

Quote-only average estimate; replace it with your quote

Published pricing, no quote needed

The revenue share is the big number

A custom amount overrides the dropdown

Sellers report 2-4% above the contracted minimum; enter your contract's rate

Accept their quote
$0
per month subscription
 
Year one: $0
Keep it + add InfiPlex
$0
per month subscription
$0 revenue share on InfiPlex volume
Year one: $0
Kept per year
$0
 
Two ways this goes

The add-a-connection pattern

The add-a-connection pattern

The platforms you already pay

  • Revenue share: Rithum's largest component, per its own SEC filings, is a fixed minimum plus a percentage of GMV above it; sellers report 2-4%
  • Priced per connection: one ERP connection at Pipe17 is $24,000/yr, Flxpoint lists $50 per connector per month, Webgility lists $20 per channel, all on their own pages
  • Rationed by tier: Cin7 Core allows 2, 4, or 6 channel integrations per plan; Celigo's Standard and Professional editions list 3 endpoints, so the next system is an upgrade
  • Quote-only everywhere else: Brightpearl, Feedonomics, Logicbroker, FarApp, SPS Commerce, Linnworks, and Extensiv price a new connection by custom quote, at renewal leverage
The coexistence move

Keep it, add InfiPlex

  • Your current platform stays untouched, no migration
  • New connections run through InfiPlex from $49.99/mo, published
  • New-channel volume never enters a GMV share base
  • Growth plans include 2-4 new integrations built free per year
VS
Sourced, not asserted

The receipts

Platform Documented cost pattern Where that number lives
Rithum Fixed minimum plus a percentage of GMV above it, per its largest component's own SEC filings; sellers report that percentage at 2-4%; a ~$50M seller commonly lands at $60,000-$150,000+/yr; $2,000+/mo minimums and multi-year terms; per-transaction EDI charges as separate line items SEC filings, seller reports
Pipe17 $24,000/yr entry tier including exactly one ERP connection; NetSuite sync on a once-daily interval Their own Shopify App Store listing
Extensiv Quote-only; implementations documented at $7,000+; ~$10M sellers commonly at $12,000-$36,000/yr; five acquired products on one invoice Seller reports, public comparison analyses
Linnworks No published pricing; annual-only contracts; typical bills $4,000-$18,000+/yr, with the upper end driven by renewal increases Their own site (no rate card), seller reports
SPS Commerce Bills per document exchanged plus setup fees; base pricing not published; subscription stays billable whether or not it is used Their own public materials
Brightpearl Quote-only after a discovery process; complex onboarding commonly 3-6+ months with billing the whole time; fewer support channels since the Sage acquisition Their own site (quote-only), seller reports
Celigo Quote-only; priced by endpoints and flows; Standard and Professional editions list 3 endpoints and 20 flows, so each new system counts against the edition or forces an upgrade Their own pricing page
FarApp / NetSuite Connector Sold through Oracle NetSuite, quote-only, licensed per connector; SKU mappings locked once created; unresolved issues routed to paid Advanced Customer Support NetSuite's own materials, NetSuite user community
Feedonomics Quote-only with monthly minimums; real bills commonly $1,000-$5,000+/mo for a feed platform that added order routing in 2025 and calls it "OMS-lite" Their own site, seller reports
Logicbroker Quote-based; $3,000/yr shown on its app listing; built for the retailer, so suppliers connect per program through a portal or document spec Their own app listing
Flxpoint $799/mo Business plan includes 8 source and 2 channel connectors; $50 per additional connector per month; Pro and Enterprise quote-only; 30-75 days to live Their own pricing page
Cin7 Core at $349, $599, or $1,199/mo with 2, 4, or 6 channel integrations per tier; Omni quote-only; EDI and 3PL through partner solutions Their own pricing page
Webgility $69 to $749/mo by plan and QuickBooks edition; 2-3 channels included, $20 per channel after; EDI a $99/mo add-on; an accounting sync, not an OMS Their own pricing page
InfiPlex $49.99, $499.99, or $999.99/mo, published in full; no revenue share, no per-document fees, no per-connector fees, no channel caps; Growth plans include 2-4 new integrations built free per year The public pricing page, no call required

Where a vendor publishes a number, it is cited from their own pricing page, app listing, or filings. Where they don't, the figure comes from what sellers describe paying, marked as such. Each platform name links to its full side-by-side. Nothing on this page presents an estimate as a competitor's quote: your actual quote is the calculator's input.

Why the pricing differs

Built, not bought

Extensiv is five companies: 3PL Central acquired Tracker Systems in 2016, then Skubana, Scout, and CartRover in 2021, rebranding in 2022, and the acquired products were never fully unified into one platform. Rithum is ChannelAdvisor, CommerceHub, and Dsco merged and renamed. Linnworks is a private equity portfolio company combined with SkuVault. Cin7 Core is DEAR Systems, acquired in 2021 and sold alongside the original Cin7 Omni as two products. Brightpearl belongs to Sage since 2022, Feedonomics to BigCommerce since 2021, and FarApp to Oracle NetSuite since 2021, each priced by the parent's sales process rather than a rate card.

Acquisition economics show up on the invoice. Minimums exist to cover what was paid for the pieces. Revenue shares exist so the bill grows with you automatically. Custom quotes exist because five stitched systems can't share one price list. And renewal leverage exists because leaving a platform that is really five platforms is exactly as hard as it sounds, which is priced in.

The tools that were built rather than bought meter instead: Cin7 caps channel integrations per tier, Flxpoint and Webgility bill per connector or channel, Celigo counts endpoints per edition. It is a different mechanism with the same result. The bill moves every time you add a connection, and the connection you need most is the one that pushes you over the line into the next tier.

Every one of InfiPlex's 130+ integrations was written on one codebase by the same team. That is the whole reason a new connection here is a line item on a published price list instead of a project with a quote, and why Growth plans can include 2-4 new integrations built free per year: building connections is what the codebase is for, not something assembled through acquisitions.

The one worth reading twice

Rithum, by the numbers

Rithum doesn't publish pricing. It doesn't have to: ChannelAdvisor filed the model with the SEC for years. A fixed minimum, then a percentage of everything above it. The percentage is the part sellers report.

2-4%

of monthly GMV above the contracted minimum, the range sellers report for the variable fee

$2,400/mo

what the reported 4% rate comes to on just $60,000 of monthly GMV, before the subscription line

$2,000+/mo

reported contract minimums, on multi-year terms, with launch fees sellers report around $3,000

$60,000-$150,000+

per year, where independent analyses place a seller doing roughly $50M in annual revenue

The arithmetic on the reported range, not a quote: at 2%, $500,000 of monthly volume is $120,000 a year in revenue share alone. At $1,000,000 a month it's $240,000 at 2% and $480,000 at 4%, before the subscription, the implementation, or the quoted price of the connection itself. Volume routed through InfiPlex instead never enters that base, which is why the revenue share line in the calculator above is usually the largest number on this page.

AI agents

Connect your AI agents to InfiPlex

One more line for the comparison: an AI agent connected to your order management costs nothing extra on InfiPlex. Every InfiPlex instance runs a native MCP server, so Claude, ChatGPT through Codex, Cursor, or any MCP client can search orders, explain why an order routed to a warehouse, check inventory across warehouses, read the shop log, record tracking, and set prices in plain English, with a preview before anything channel-visible changes. It is included with API access, and connecting takes about five minutes. This is headless order management: the engine keeps running and your agents become the interface, with autonomy set per key from read-only to fully autonomous. Not sure what that means for security? The plain-English answer, or watch a demo.

FAQ

Questions people ask about running both

Do I have to leave my current platform to use InfiPlex?

No. InfiPlex connects alongside whatever you run today. The coexistence setup is the point: your existing platform keeps its connections, InfiPlex carries the new ones, and both feed the same operation.

Why is the revenue share usually the biggest number on this page?

Because it scales with volume and the subscription doesn't. At the 2-4% sellers report, $500,000 of monthly GMV is $120,000 to $240,000 a year, which dwarfs any subscription line. Volume routed through InfiPlex never enters that base.

Is adding a connection through InfiPlex really cheaper than adding it to my current platform?

Most likely yes, and usually by a large margin. The calculator above breaks down your exact numbers, subscription and revenue share separately, against published InfiPlex tiers: $49.99, $499.99, or $999.99 a month, with Growth plans including 2-4 new integrations built at no development cost per year.

Where do the competitor numbers on this page come from?

Three kinds of sources, each labeled: SEC filings for how the model is structured, vendors' own listings where they publish a price, and seller reports and independent analyses where they don't. No estimate on this page is presented as a competitor's quote; your actual quote is the calculator's input.

What does InfiPlex cost, exactly?

$49.99 a month for Basic Starter, $499.99 for Growth Starter, $999.99 for Growth Pro, published in full with no revenue share and no per-document fees.

My platform charges per channel or caps channels per tier instead of a revenue share. Does the calculator still apply?

Yes. Set the revenue share to 0% and enter the per-connection fee or the tier step-up as the quoted increase. Picking Flxpoint, Webgility, or Cin7 in the dropdown fills in the published figure from their own pricing pages: $50 per connector, $20 per channel, or the jump between Cin7 Core tiers. The comparison is then subscription against subscription, and InfiPlex has no per-connector fee and no channel cap on any plan.

What if I eventually want to consolidate onto one platform?

Nothing forces it either way. If the InfiPlex-side connections earn it, consolidation happens on your renewal timeline as a decision, not a cutover deadline, and the connections that would move are already running.

See the difference yourself

No email, no sales call to see pricing.

Why InfiPlex  ·  vs. Extensiv  ·  vs. Linnworks  ·  vs. Brightpearl  ·  vs. Rithum  ·  vs. SPS Commerce  ·  vs. Pipe17  ·  vs. Celigo  ·  vs. FarApp / NetSuite Connector  ·  vs. Feedonomics  ·  vs. Logicbroker  ·  vs. Flxpoint  ·  vs. Cin7  ·  vs. Webgility